“And when the people saw that Moses delayed to come down out of the mount, the people gathered themselves together unto Aaron, and said unto him, Up, make us gods, which shall go before us; for as for this Moses, the man that brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we wot not what is become of him. And Aaron said unto them, Break off the golden earrings, which are in the ears of your wives, of your sons, and of your daughters, and bring them unto me. And all the people brake off the golden earrings which were in their ears, and brought them unto Aaron. And he received them at their hand, and fashioned it with a graving tool, after he had made it a molten calf: and they said, These be thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.” Exodus 32:1-4 KJV

As things would have it, my crowning glory declared: ‘Tonight we’ve got to watch the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympic Games!’ Feeling in a generous mood I obliged and we sat, as a family, to watch the spectacle unfold. What a spectacle it was indeed; an opening ceremony that pulled back the curtain on the psychological and spiritual train wreck that is France; an opening ceremony entirely inappropriate for children and minors; an opening ceremony that caused quite the stir to say the least.

Did you watch it?

We tuned in to Lady Gaga singing. As an American singer with quite the provocative and racy reputation I had to wonder why she was chosen and not some genuine French talent? A short while later it seems that question was answered when an hommage to Paris as the ‘City of Love’ was turned perverse with an inter-racial, manage-a-trois that thankfully came to an abrupt end with the door being slammed in our face! A theme was building.

As with all Olympic Games ceremonies the performances are interspersed with the arrival of the various athletic contingents from the participating countries and thus began the boats large and small floating down the River Seine laden with the competitors in their various national uniforms waving flags.

As the boats were drifting by the camera settled into focus on a beautiful old building, the kind for which Paris is famous, a sort of mini Chateau Versailles style edifice, which featured in multiple upper windows headless Marie-Antionettes holding their own heads singing something to the tune of “all will be well”. The windows of the building vomitted paper streams of blood onto the streets below while a rock band dressed in black played death metal. The spirit of rebellion was palpable.

There had been a young faceless character in quasi revolutionary garb running on the rooftops of Paris carrying the Olympic Torch through various feats of Parcour. He was pretty exciting to watch.

He would come and go amidst the other stages of the parade. If I recall correctly he made his way to a bridge and then, there it was. For a moment I had to ask of myself if I were seeing what I thought I was. No one else seemed to notice. I had to shake my head because I was sure it was the ‘Last Supper’ by Leonardo DaVinci, but it was trannies in drag, the ‘messiah’ an obese woman!

Yet, there was no time to get caught up in all of that because straight away the dinner table was revealed as a runway and immediately commenced a transgender fashion show. At this point, with a fully bearded man dressed up in a woman’s office outfit trying to be lusty and sexy, my daughter was yelling ‘make it stop!’ while burying her face in the pillow. Despite the typical celebratory enthusiasm of modern homosexual pride events, the mix of costumes included items apparently inspired by both goth and garbage bins; the carnal vibe was palatable; lascivious was the scene.

That all of this was happening in Paris, a city with an ancient history that would have long ago indeed been the centre of pagan festivities of similar nature is really quite fitting. It was, for those with the wherewithal to comprehend it a thorough reminder of our own ancient Pagan past. So, there appears to have been a rather serious misunderstanding of the events displayed. I say ‘appears to have been’ a misunderstanding because beauty is in the eye of the beholder, hence the diabolical nature of perversion; it is confusion. However, that was not what the brains behind the scene Thomas Jolly had intended:

““The Last Supper” was not the inspiration behind the scene, the sequence was titled “festivity” and featured Dionysus, the Greek God of celebration. Now, Dionysus is a fascinating character from Greek mythology. He’s the God of wine, fertility, theatre, and religious ecstasy. He’s all about joy, revelry, and bringing people together to celebrate life. So, Jolly’s idea was to create a grand, pagan party linked to the God of Mount Olympus, with absolutely no intention of mocking anyone.”

Given that we are talking about the Olympic Games, this explanation should be taken accordingly; the Olympic Games are ultimately a pagan event from our pagan past. Nonetheless, regardless the fitting Olympic hommage and modern historical re-interpretation, and regardless the intentions of Thomas Jolly, and others involved in the production, people got offended. (I however was mistaken. I thought the fellow in blue was Bacchus!). Below is the inspiring artwork which, is clearly not the ‘Last Supper’ but does look very similar indeed.

With all of that in mind, one does have to wonder if, regardless all the suitable justification for this section of the ceremony, there were indeed some open mockery going on? Was there really no one suggesting: ‘ah, folks we may want to rethink this section, this is getting a little close to the ‘Last Supper’?’ Having worked in Art Departments in film & television productions for a decade I can say with pretty good confidence that those Art Directors would have known of DaVinci’s work and it’s relevance to Christians. That no one suggested changing the camera angle is a bit odd to say the least. Yet, isn’t that the power of art, the ability to say more than one thing at a time, depending upon how you look at it? According to Jolly, that is simply not the case:

“My wish isn’t to be subversive, nor to mock or to shock. Most of all, I wanted to send a message of love, a message of inclusion and not at all to divide.”

Hmmm. Isn’t that convenient how the campaign of ‘inclusion’ fits so well with known techniques of subversion.

Anyway, it’s very revealing these events happened in Paris, capital of France, because France after all is the Israelite tribe of Rueben.

“And Jacob was a hundred years old when the Lord appeared unto him, and blessed him and called his name Israel, and Rachel the wife of Jacob conceived in those days. And at that time Jacob and all belonging to him journeyed from Bethel to go to his father’s house, to Hebron. And whilst they were going on the road, and there was yet but a little way to come to Ephrath, Rachel bare a sone and she had a hard labor and she died. And Jacob buried her in the way to Eprath, which is Bethlehem, and he set a pillar upon her grave, which is there unto this day, and the days of Rachel were forty-five years and she died. And Jacob called the name of his son that was born to him, which Rachel bare unto him, Benjamin, for he was born to him in the land on the right hand. And it was after the death of Rachel, that Jacob pitched his tent in the tent of her handmaid Bilhah. And Reuben was jealous for his mother Leah on account of this, and he was filled with anger, and he rose up in his anger and went and entered the tent of Bilhah and he thence removed his father’s bed. At that time the portion of birthright, together with the kingly and priestly offices, was removed from the sons of Reuben, for he had profaned his father’s bed, and the birthright was given unto Joseph, the kingly office to Judah, and the priesthood unto Levi, because Reuben had defiled his father’s bed.” Book of Jasher 36:9-15

Just to flesh out a bit more of the history of the people of Reuben and their patriarch, not only does Reuben defile his father’s bed in a fit of anger and jealousy, lose his birthright, lose the kingly and priestly offices but is given the following prophecy by his father Jacob/Israel upon his death bed:

“Reuben, thou art my firstborn, my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity, and the excellency of power: Unstable as water, thou shalt not excel; because thou wentest up to thy father’s bed; then defiledst thou it: he went up to my couch.” Genesis 49:3,4 KJV (underline mine)

Now, there is considerably more on the story of Reuben/France/Paris, however to cut to the chase on what is particularly relevant to these 2024 Olympic Games in Paris, below is a particularly important piece of artwork:

The relevance of this art, the history it reveals is explained by Dr. Taylor Marshall:

“This is Saint Ambrose telling Theodosius he is excommuicated; he cannot enter into the Church, he can’t receive communion. Even though he is a Catholic; he’s a Christian. He cannot enter into the cathedral because he has killed innocent civilians, Thessalonians. And Ambrose meets him at the door and says ‘you must repent publicly and then you can be admitted into the Church and then you can receive the Eucharist.’… …Theodosius did in fact repent publicly and was reconciled with the Church, with Christ and was allowed back to recieve Holy Communion. But the same Theodosius is the one who banned the Olympic Games… …When the Roman Empire became Christian, it started under Constantine the Great, but by the time you get to Theodosius he starts enacting Christian Law; Constantine made Catholic Christianity legal and gave it rights, but Theodosius was the one who made Catholic Christianity the official religion of the state. And when he did that he banned the Olympic Games. He said ‘the Olympic Games are pagan and they must be cancelled.’ Guess when the Olympic Games began to come back? The French Revolution… …The same France that sent nuns to the guillotine, that killed Louis and Marie-Antionette, they are the ones in Paris who tried to resurrect the Olympic Games. Why did Paris during the French Revolution want to resurrect the Olympic Games? Because French revolutionary Paris wanted to be pagan. They turned Notre-Dame Cathedral into a temple of reason and had a whore, a harlot, a prostitute on the altar. So the resurrection of the Olympic, modern Olympic games is atheistic, it’s French, it’s Parisien and it is anti-Jesus Christ. Now we are seeing in 2024, Paris, atheistic Paris, abominable Paris is once again renouncing their king Jesus Christ… … They are returning to ancient paganism.”

Like it or not, agree with its’ theology or not, the primary vehicle by which Christianity spread was Roman Catholicism. However, the manner in which various people/races/nations around the world, and even the Israelite tribes became Christians affected the type of Christian they became. Reuben/France was no exception. We can see that the French have some kind of love/hate relationship with God much the same way Reuben had with his father Jacob/Israel. There was never any great reason for the French Revolution and for France to become the quasi-dysfunctional mess they have been ever since, but there they are prophecy fulfilled; ‘Unstable as water, thou shalt not excel.’

Thus, that these events transpired in Paris, capital of France once known as the ‘eldest daughter of the Church’, it should not come as any surprise that Catholics were the first out of the gate to decry the abomination and mockery of Christianity – and fair enough.

“The opening ceremony of the 2024 Olympic Games have openly mocked our Lord Jesus Christ, openly mocked in a satanic anti-Christic way not only Jesus Christ, but the ‘Last Supper’ and all ‘christians’.” Dr. Taylor Marshall

Yet, who are the Catholics to be complaining? The Roman Catholic Church has over the course of its’ long existence created a fair mess of its’ own. In the days that followed this uproar I happened to notice a response to an Internet post; the post had stated Catholicism was, effectively, less than scripturally accurate from its inception and the response declared such a claim was counterproductive and ‘immature!’ Unfortunately, it is not immature to suggest that Catholicism has been theologically problematic from the get-go, it is in fact critical to understand. If there are those in our midst that come from a Christian background which, openly exclaim in frustration ‘I can’t understand this story!’, do ya’ think good ol’ Catholicism might just have something to do with that? Mais oui!

For example, we know that Emperor Constantine admitted to placing the crucifixion at the pagan feast of Easter, simply so that Christianity would not look like Judaism if the crucifixion were remembered at Passover. Folks, Yahowsha was crucified at Passover; He was the Passover Lamb. Can anyone really ever hope to understand the truth of The Anointed Christ if their head is full of false names and corruptions such as this made on account of geopolitics? True understanding cannot be built upon a foundation of lies. The theologically problematic religion of Roman Catholicism needs be called out, and not because of any desire to beat up on Catholics, but because many good people are in fact being taken for a ride; taken for a ride by a religion whose principal objectives were never spiritual nor scriptural truth (despite the declarations of ‘Sola Scriptura’!), but carnal earthly power. As I have stated elsewhere in this blog, man-made religions will come and go but The Truth will endure; Roman Catholicism is going to be devoured by its own corrupt theology. The Catholic Church must start correcting the record. Given the current Pope seems loathe to declare with any authority that life begins at conception and the high probability the Catholic Church will soon be blessing gay marriage while flying the rainbow flag things are not looking good. If the Roman Catholic Church does fly the rainbow flag that will leave Catholics to abandon their corrupt church like Christians of most other denominations. It would seem that soon the majority of Christians will be non-denominational. The Fathers’ will be done.

Just for the record, here are a few of the major theological blunders of the Roman Catholic Church:

1. Christmas: The birth of the Messiah was not December 25. This date was chosen because it was a pagan high feast day, and known to the pagans they sought to convert. The scriptures clarify when Messiah was born.
2. The Trinity: The Catholic Church elevated Mary to be a Goddess to create a Trinity where there isn’t one, again to advance the conversion of the pagans to Christianity. Tertullian advanced the concept of a ‘Trinitas’ to express the idea of one God coming in three forms, a nonsense we have proven to be so elsewhere in this blog. Elohim are Father & Son as made clear by Paul in his epistles.
3. The Baptismal Formula: The correct baptism formula is found in Acts 2:22. The scriptures were doctored at Matthew 28:19 to advance the cause of baptising into the Trinity. While this may seem like a ‘who cares?’ It is not a trifle in the slightest but yet another major stumbling block in the way of those trying to enter in to the Sabbath Rest.
4. The Heliocentric Universe: This one is a whole documentary, which fortunately has been already completed. So get your popcorn and enjoy.

Now, with the critiques of the 2024 Paris Olympic Games opening ceremonies being described by Catholics such as Taylor Marshall as ‘satanic’, a penny dropped. Prior to these Olympics I had not previously understood just how much of the current ‘Satan’/’End Times’ mania comes from Catholicism! This, interestingly also explains any number of attempts to smear the Catholic Church as worshippers of ‘Satan’ due to the use, for example of Lucifer, in traditional hymns. Roman Catholicism has long taught about Lucifer as the Devil and his fall from heaven etc. These teachings are well and concisely dismantled by Messenger Charles. So, while there is actually a Lucifer religion that does need to be exposed and made comprehensible to the general public this post is not the place to get into all of that. Moreover, from what I did actually see, I didn’t notice anything that struck me as being particularly relevant to or from the Lucifer religion, at least as far as I understand it. Therefore, to my mind accusations of ’satanic’ Olympic ceremonies seem to me for the most part to be misguided, outrageous name-calling, hyperbole and religious gaslighting that frankly doesn’t help the general cause of state religions that fall under the banner of Christianity. Such accusations tend to make the people shouting them look like lunatics in the eyes of more rational minds, like those that declared Barack Obama was the anti-christ because he wrote left hand and now declare Donald Trump is the anti-christ because he survived assassination. Please.

I have seen suggestions from other sources that the horse and rider were from the Book of Revelation.

Really? Given that the Olympic ceremonies are produced by the host country not the IOC, I’d say the idea that the creators were showing Book of Revelation events is a case of reading into the ceremonies what you want to see. The idea that this scene is an omen indicating ‘End Times’ events are soon due to happen is something that only someone caught up in ‘End Times’ mania would think of. Last time I checked such people are not likely gainfully employed in designing Olympic ceremonies. It’s just as probable that if some ceremonial presentations were intentional, perhaps the idea was to gauge public reaction to such material to see where people are at and where they can take the Church?

Nonetheless, fire and brimstone ‘Satan’/‘End Times’ outrage is not the kind of critique that should be put forward by Church authorities or Christians. What should be declared with clear, concise confidence is the abomination of perversion that was on display. However, the Church won’t; they will not declare The Law.

“None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am the LORD. The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness. The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness. The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover. The nakedness of thy son’s daughter, or of thy daughter’s daughter, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover: for theirs is thine own nakedness. The nakedness of thy father’s wife’s daughter, begotten of thy father, she is thy sister, thou shalt not uncover her nakedness. Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father’s sister: she is thy father’s near kinswoman. Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother’s sister: for she is thy mother’s near kinswoman. Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father’s brother, thou shalt not approach to his wife: she is thine aunt. Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy daughter in law: she is thy son’s wife; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness. Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother’s wife: it is thy brother’s nakedness. Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness. Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister, to vex her, to uncover her nakedness, beside the other in her life time. Also thou shalt not approach unto a woman to uncover her nakedness, as long as she is put apart for her uncleanness. Moreover thou shalt not lie carnally with thy neighbour’s wife, to defile thyself with her. And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD. Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.” Leviticus 18:6-23 KJV (Underline mine)

Now, this word ‘satanic’ is indeed a diabolical word that confuses many. To my mind, buildings vomiting blood while headless Marie-Antionettes sing to death metal actually qualifies as pretty demonic activity, and could very well be ‘satanic’ activity. Yet there is so much nonsense and baggage associated with the word ‘satanic’ it is ill-advised IMHO to freely throw that word around. Here is perhaps a more useful breakdown of ‘satanism’.

The other major problem with ‘Satan’/’End Times’ shock material is not just that it’s scripturally unfounded, but that it blinds Christians to the real adversaries in their midst. By invoking some larger than life, horned, demon deity that is nowhere to be found and never seen, Christians look like mentally unstable neighbours that perhaps need professional care, like kooks chasing red-herring figments of imagination, while their adversaries do what they do in broad daylight unnoticed, almost unseen.

Christians seem to be effectively fast asleep and unable to figure out that any number of people are not their friends. Folks, bankers are not friends. Politicians are not friends. When Caesar coined his own, the bankers paid off the Senators and were soon back in business. Nothing has changed. People of other faiths aren’t friends. They don’t share Christian values and they certainly don’t keep The Commandments of Christ.

“Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.” John 15:14 KJV

Even though lapsed and lost Christians may still share some Christian values (and obviously take them for granted as if they were naturally universal), they are not necessarily friends either. Many might be flesh and blood kith and kin. Many don’t keep/guard/defend His Commandments. Is this a problem? I’d say so, and I’d say these people almost constitute a majority in the major countries of the  formerly Christian West. It is the lapsed, lost and demoralised formerly Christian people that are the biggest voice of apathy in the world. Just what values do these people have and which do they take for granted? For them Christ seems to be just another story so what’s the point? For them they seem to pick and choose when they want to twist the words of Christ to suit their need. With their lapse the foundation of civilisation implodes; moral relativism triumphs; perversion reigns. It is confusion.

The Paris ceremonies should be a slap in the face wake up call to all Christians. However, there is no doubt there are many religious Christians that watched these ceremonies and saw nothing. Others just saw their twisted post-religious New Age ‘christian’ faith on display; a ‘woke’ Last Supper. There are now countless post-religious New Age ‘christians’ (P.R.N.A. ‘christians’), around the world for whom with enough love and forgiveness even the troubled, marginalised homosexuals, transgenders and pedophiles get the blessing of Christ. For these P.R.N.A. ‘christians’ Christ seems to be a rainbow flag flying, effeminate, hippy doormat, forever mutilating The Law to make peace with the adversaries thereof; forever dispensing endless forgiveness; always extolling empathy and compassion. Unconditional love appears to be the feel-good faith of P.R.N.A. ‘christians’ today, which, seem to have decided Christ forgives people in all their perversions because they do; they justify this by claiming this is what Christ meant. It’s a dead end road that looks an easy street to Utopia and apparently all motivated by what makes one feel good. Such is the easy reasoned way P.R.N.A. ‘christians’ appear to travel. Do they get a rush of feel-good hormones playing this game?

While I can’t be certain what’s going on with these people, it does seem to be a case of warp the scriptures to suit your own desire. So, what is the desire? It appears to be a desire to make The Anointed Christ a universal, one-size-fits-all messiah of everyone and everything; mopping the brows of all and condoning their rebellion against His Law whatever their pleasure; Dionysus in a love fest where none can be offended!

So, the question in front of more traditional Christians (religious or not) that want to build their civilisation upon The Law of The Anointed Christ is this:

“Do you want to stand before Him and say: ‘We wanted to build a civilisation in your name but they came to corrupt it and we let them; we did nothing.’? Or do you want to say, ‘We built that civilisation in your name upon your laws and when they tried to corrupt it we stopped them; we cleaned them out – and sorry things got a bit ugly’?“

There is an important choice here. Having inclusive celebratory festivals sounds like a nice idea but can readily be promoted to the point of stupidity. Though the Olympics is not supposed to be a political event, but rather a sporting one, politics always seems to creep in through cultural artwork that ‘pushes the boundaries.’ Using large events to promote political issues that aim to redefine the foundation of civilisation is the method. However, building civilisation upon the perversions of transgenderism would be akin to building upon shifting sands. Transgenders openly declare they don’t know who they are. Maybe in five years they will identify as something else?

“Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:” Matthew 7:24-26 KJV

Building any future upon the psychosis of gender dysphoria is a recipe for suicide, which, apparently is the whole idea of promoting this psychological madness; hastening the death of the once Christian West.

So, there is now a very important bit of work to do in terms of strengthening the Christian house as it were, so badly tattered after 500 years of ‘Reformation’. These ceremonies were a test. Silence will be taken as acquiescence as it always is and formerly Christian societies will continue to drift into Marxism. Are Europeans really Christian anymore just because their countries have been Christian for centuries? Though descended of Jacob/Israel as we’ve seen in Paris, many are in open rebellion.

Folks, the shining city on the hill cannot be built out of moral relativity. The building of the shining city on the hill must be done with purpose everyday; no doubt the purposeful action missing from the lives of so many.

Christianity, and more specifically the New Covenant Law provides a way of living that produces prosperity and peaceful civilisation. The once Christian West now has hostiles, turncoats, traitors and sell outs from its’ own kith and kin. Cultural and spiritual priorities are inside out. For Christians, the multiplicity of denominations should now be the call to abandon those very denominations and unite in faith in Christ; differences in understanding notwithstanding.

“For he that is not against us is on our part.” Mark 9:40 KJV

The life and spiritual journey of a true Christian is not about pleasing the doctrines of any church, which, as we know change from time to time, but in getting closer to The Anointed Christ. The Christian path is about learning how to walk with Christ. As the child regards the parent as the zenith of courage, justice, morality, strength, truth, and virtue, so should the adult/parent regard The Anointed Christ.

In the day following the opening Olympic ceremonies there were widespread blackouts all over Paris with the exception of Sacre-Coeur Cathedral, which, sitting atop a hill was accordingly basked in light.

While things of this nature are in fact possible to stage, powering down neighbourhoods and leaving others functioning, I choose to see this as a symbol. A church basked in light while all else is in darkness is not the Catholic Church being singled out but the body of Christ; the true church; His heirs. Anybody still thinking they’re in the correct church, or that they’ve picked the winning team having won the denomination sweepstakes has missed the point and learned nothing. We can no longer assume that the Catholic Church or any other is the true correct church and pure as the driven snow.

“Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you. Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.” Matthew 5:9-13 KJV (underline mine)

There it is. Don’t be an all-forgiving, pacifist wimp grovelling with enemies and trading away His Law. If you have put on the armour of Christ keep His Commandments.; they were given to you not everybody else that could care less. The weapons are in the Keep and the keeping of the Commandments are your weapons.

As for the Olympic games, they should be a celebration of divine creation and all the incredible things mankind can do being made in the image of The Creator.