Editor’s Note: This ATJFTP Series was first written and published beginning in late 2017. Most recent update and revision 2025.

Who is the Anti-Christ? Isn’t that the hair-raising, spine tingling and mind-blowing question everyone wants the answer to? lol

Well dear reader, if you stick around to the end you might just get one. In the meantime let me start off by admitting that I’m hardly an authority on the subject; the Anti-Christ would appear to be quite the subject for one to claim to be an authority on. In fact, I would hazard a guess that if anyone is claiming to be an authority on such a subject, that person is likely insane, or someone to be taken with a heap of salt. Frankly, being sure of the people and events of prophecy is something I have long held to be a bit of a mug’s game, the kind of game where you can have a fast one pulled and be taken for all you’re worth. Also, I’m just not going to recommend that you take it lying down from anyone. Personally, I’m pretty much fed up with the so-called ‘experts’ put out, which descend from the peer review process and shovel the correct rhetoric. So, just to be clear, being an authority on the Anti-Christ is not only something I do not personally strive to be, nor am I going to get into violent arguments on this topic with passerby, but please do leave an appropriate comment if you feel so inclined.

So why am I writing a post on this issue if I don’t have any great revelation for y’all? Indeed. Does one put a cart before a horse? Of course one does not. However, in these days of “just Google it” due diligence seems to have gone out the window. Yet, it pays to be prudent, get the basics sorted and proceed one step at a time. To call resolving the Anti-Christ a trivial matter doesn’t really make sense. It is not a trivial matter, which, of course implies that it is at least a somewhat important issue. However, there are far more important and fundamental issues, and if these fundamental issues haven’t been addressed, what good is advanced knowledge on the Anti-Christ? Therefore, the article “Who Is the Anti-Christ?” may well be case in point of putting the cart before the horse; of proposing advanced knowledge without the fundamentals having been established. Without fundamentals being established the interpretations and conclusions are bound to be erroneous!

So, musings on the Anti-Christ will have to wait a moment while we look at a critical graphic from “Who Is The Anti-Christ?” which will allow us to get straight to the heart of getting the basics sorted before proceeding to more advanced material. Let’s just give the graphic below a quick look:

Now dear reader, I have just saved you the trouble of reading the article “Who Is The Anti-Christ?” from where this graphic arises by showing you the handy chart featured in it. You can see for your self what it says:

“Gospel preached only to Jews.” / “Gospel preached to Gentiles.”

Ladies and gentlemen, the article “Who Is The Anti-Christ?” presumably represents hours of research and yet is quite possibly predicated upon a very major problem, the idea of Old Testament ‘Jews’ and New Testament ‘Gentiles’.

Therefore, I must now officially welcome any readers that have come to this post via “The Salary Men of Fake Jews” and I must also advise dear reader if you have not read “The Salary Men of Fake Jews”  please do so to get up to speed on the proposition raised there that ‘Jews’ are NOT of Judah and therefore NOT Old Covenant Israel. That ‘Jews’ are NOT of Judah and therefore NOT Old Covenant Israel is likely to be a shocking, threatening and even outrageous claim for some. Further, such a claim raises questions about the word ‘Gentiles’ too. Welcome to “Who Is The Antichrist” Part 2 of the ATJFTP series. 

To get straight to it then let’s take a look at the following verse:

“That Hanani, one of my brethren, came, he and certain men of Judah; and I asked them concerning the Jews that had escaped, which were left of the captivity, and concerning Jerusalem.” Nehemiah 1:2 KJV

As we can see in this verse from the KJV, certain men are referred to as being ‘of Judah’, and a question is asked regarding escaped ‘Jews’ which, “were left of the captivity” (not taken). If those of the House of Judah had in truth been referred to as ‘Jews’ why doesn’t the passage read something like this:

“That Hanani, one of my brethren, came, he and certain men of the Jews; and I asked them concerning the Jews that had escaped…”

If, on the other hand the House of Judah was in fact referred to as Judah or ‘Judeans’ why doesn’t the passage should read something like this:

“That Hanani, one of my brethren, came, he and certain men of Judah; and I asked them concerning those of Judah/the Judeans that had escaped…”

But it doesn’t say either of those things. It says:

“That Hanani, one of my brethren, came, he and certain men of Judah; and I asked them concerning the Jews that had escaped, which were left of the captivity, and concerning Jerusalem.” Nehemiah 1:2

So, why argue with the obvious? We either have 1) two different entities being discussed, 2) the use of a slang colloquial or 3) a corruption of scripture confusing the two. 

Now just to refresh our selves, here again is the first usage of the term ‘Jews’ in the Bible:

“At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day.” 2Kings 16:6

Again, if Judah were in fact known as ‘Judah’ and were indeed the subject of this verse it should look like this:

“At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave Judah from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day.”

So, once again we either have two different entities being discussed or, a corruption of scripture with Judah and ‘Jews’ being confused. Who actually was being driven from Elath? Why was this notable? Is this indicating where Judah had success and then failure in establishing territory or a different group emerging known as ‘Jews”? Why not call them Judah if that is who they were, or were these ‘Jews’ indeed the bastard Canaanite children of Judah, which descend from Shelah as discovered in “The Salary Men of Fake Jews”? 

Perhaps now would be a good time to get it sorted on from whence the Canaanites derive? Perhaps now would be a good time to roughly sketch their cursed origins?

Noah had three sons: Shem, Ham and Japeth. Canaanites descend from Canaan. Canaan is the product of an incestuous relationship between Ham and his mother; Noah’s wife.

Ham defiles his father’s bed. Ham has incestuous sex with his mother. Noah curses the corrupt offspring ‘Canaan’. 

“And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.” Genesis 9:18

Ham is the father of Canaan and we are told plainly to ensure there is no doubt about it. As to the incestuous affair here are the relevant scriptures on that:

“And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.” Genesis 9:22 (Underline mine)

“And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.” Leviticus 20:11 (Underline mine)

“Cursed be he that lieth with his father’s wife; because he uncovereth his father’s skirt. And all the people shall say, Amen.” Deuteronomy 27:20 (Underline mine)

So, there is the explanation in the books of Leviticus and Deuteronomy of what “uncovering a father’s nakedness” actually means (and thanks to Messenger Charles for dragging my eyeballs there.) 

Now, I will admit I am not a scholar of ancient Hebrew, but given my awareness of Latin declensions and other qualities of words, such as sound, root or emphasis IMHO this name ‘Canaan’ truly interpreted could mean something like continuity of Cain, wickedness of Cain, or spirit of Cain. While I don’t have the technical academic knowledge or evidence to prove this it’s evident Noah curses the corrupt offspring severely.

“And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.”
Genesis 9:24,25

So, at this point, let’s establish something essential; there were actually four races to come out of the Ark: Semites, Hamites, Japethites and cursed servile Canaanites. There’s no race of ‘Jews’ I’m afraid.

While we’re here let’s note there is no race of ‘Gentiles’ either. The word ‘Gentile’ first appears in Genesis 10, shortly after the flood. Jacob/Israel from whence the Israelites derive is not yet a gleam in his father’s eye:

“By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.” Genesis 10:5

So, let’s just get some perspective on this word ‘Gentiles’ up for consideration. The following excerpts are from Bertrand L. Comparet  “Who Are The Gentiles?” & “Your Heritage” via Messenger Charles (highlights mine):

“You may be surprised to know that there is no such word (as Gentile) in the Bible, in its original language. Oh yes, I know that you are now riffling through the pages of your King James Bible, looking for some of the many places you will find Gentile in it. However, I said that there was no such word in the original languages. The word was put into it by translators, who changed the wording of the Bible centuries after the last book of the Bible was written.”

“The word Gentile is not once used in any Hebrew manuscript of the Old Testament. There is a very good reason for this; there is no such word in Hebrew, nor any word that corresponds to it. Everywhere you find the word Gentile used in the Old Testament, it is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word goi (goy), which means nation, the plural form of it is goyim. Since it means nation, why didn’t they translate it correctly? Sometimes they did, but for the most part they translated it to fit the official doctrines of the church of their day. It didn’t matter what violence that did to the true meaning of the word.” 

Ok, that’s some interesting information on the origins of this word ‘Gentiles’. Obviously various people or nations existed and more importantly we should now consider that what the Bible should say is ‘nations’ instead of ‘Gentiles’. Thus, for example Genesis 10:5 should read as:

“By these were the isles of the nations divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.” Genesis 10:5

Do you see it folks? Do you see how bible translators have deliberately tried to make out there was a specific group of people known as ‘Gentiles’ by using the word ‘Gentiles’ in place of the word ‘nations’ which, they translate correctly at the end of the sentence? Do you see the vacillation in their usage of terms? Or were they just sloppy? Or did they just not understand the basics?

Here is yet more interesting information about the word ‘Gentiles’ from Frank W Nelte.

“In the Bible nobody is ever called ‘a Gentile’. The singular form ‘Gentile’ appears incorrectly in only two adjacent verses in the KJV, namely in Romans 2:9-10. In both those verses the Greek word incorrectly translated as ‘Gentile’ is ‘Hellen’ (i.e. hellenos in verse 9, and helleni in verse 10). This Greek word means “a Greek person”. And thus many translations have corrected these two KJV mistranslations to correctly read ‘the Greek’ instead of ‘the Gentile’. Apart from these two (in the KJV) mistranslated verses, the singular ‘Gentile’ is never used in the whole Bible. This means, as I stated above, that the Bible never refers to any individual as ‘a Gentile’.

“The Greek New Testament word that is translated as ‘Gentiles’ is ‘ethnos’. This word is used 164 times in 152 different verses in the New Testament. It is in the KJV of the Bible translated by the same four English words that we found used for the Hebrew ‘goy’: ‘nation, people, Gentiles, heathen’. ‘Ethnos’ is translated 93 times as ‘Gentiles’, 64 times as ‘nation’, 5 times as ‘heathen’ and 2 times as ‘people’.”

OK, there we have it; ‘ethnos’ 93 times mistranslated as ‘Gentiles’ instead of ‘nation’, ‘heathen’ or ‘people’. That would actually seem a bit suspicious as regards the possible doctoring of scripture in order to conjure up a ‘Jews’ and ‘Gentiles’ narrative; a narrative that seems to hold so many beguiled in delusion to this day. No yes?

At any rate, let’s not get too side-tracked. Let’s take a quick recap of the chart in “Who Is The Anti-Christ?”

So dear readers, perhaps we should scratch out this:

“Gospel preached only to Jews.” / “Gospel preached to Gentiles.”

And replace it with something like this:

“Gospel preached only to Israelites.” / “Gospel preached to the nations.”

After all, Judah was just one of the 12 tribes, or ‘nations’ of Israel descended of the patriarchs, the 12 sons of Jacob/Israel. Since all Israelites received the covenant, ‘Israelites’ would be most appropriate as opposed to Judah or worse, ‘Jews’; “Gospel preached only to Israelites.”

Now, such a change may not affect other ideas presented in “Who Is The Anti-Christ?” or, it might just derail the whole kit and caboodle by blowing up the very Old Testament ‘Jews’ – New Testament ‘Gentiles’ tracks upon which the Anti-Christ Express rides? Hopefully, changing these two erroneous statements in the graphic will jog the mind of you dear reader that the whole premise of Old Testament ‘Jews’ & New Testament ‘Gentiles’ is quite literally junk science?

At this point it is probably worth pausing to reflect upon something. Why is it that such considerable effort has been put into resolving Daniel’s prophesies by the author of “Who Is The Anti-Christ?”  only to play ball with this idea that the Old Testament ‘Jews’ were “Gods’ chosen people”? What happened to the Israelites? They just seem to fade from view. This Old Testament ‘Jews’ – New Testament ‘Gentiles’ story leaves the true history of Israel out in the barren wastes – and that just won’t do!

Ladies and gentleman I do hope you are beginning to see a path to a lost history, a fake story and bogus teachings? How can twelve tribes of Israel suddenly become ‘Jews’? How can ten tribes of the House of Israel just disappear? The persistent myth of ‘Jews’ being Judah and “Gods’ chosen people” is not just a rumour, a whisper, an echo, or even a broken telephone transmission. It is an incantation. Folks, are you beginning to see a practice of wicked ritual word magic that spawns worldwide delusion?

As I mentioned before, what good is advanced knowledge of you haven’t got the basics sorted?

Now, it’s time to bring this post to a close. First, in part 1 of the ATJFTP series we got past the red herring question of whether Jesus were a Jew to the real question of whether Jews were legitimate Israel. Second, in this post we have blasted a hole through the fairy tale of Old Testament ‘Jews’ and New Testament ‘Gentiles’. Last but not least, to get back to where we started with our headline question “Who Is The Anti-Christ?”, you will hopefully recall my suggesting that if you stick around to the end you might get direction on that. I am happy to share with you now that you won’t be getting such direction from me, but from the Apostle John:

“Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also. Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father.” 1John 2:22-24 KJV (Underline mine)

So there it is. Any and all which, deny the Elohim, the duality Godhead (two Gods acting with purpose as one; The Father and The Son; God and The Lamb, Yahowah and Yahowsha), is antichrist. That would mean the Pope, and all the Protestant denominations of official Christianity. Do you doubt it? Do you proclaim The Trinity? Then you are invited to go, and Find Me The Trinity!

As for the ATJFTP series, there is much more to come so please stick with it in Part 3. Thanks for being here.